Get In Touch

Find Us On Facebook

NDAA Compliant: A Complete Guide to Security cameras

The National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) is a federal law in the United States that sets policies and budgets for the Department of Defense. NDAA compliance is important for companies that do business with the government, as they must adhere to certain security requirements in order to be eligible for government contracts.

In terms of security systems, NDAA compliance requires that companies implement measures to protect sensitive government data, such as classified information, personally identifiable information (PII), and controlled unclassified information (CUI). These measures may include encryption, access controls, network security, and physical security.

Additionally, companies must comply with certain cybersecurity regulations, such as the Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) framework, which sets standards for protecting sensitive information. The CMMC framework requires companies to undergo third-party audits to assess their cybersecurity readiness and maturity.

How did NDAA act impacted security camera industry

What security camera brands were banned?

The National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) of 2019 included a provision that banned the use of certain Chinese-made security cameras by federal agencies and contractors. Specifically, the ban applies to cameras manufactured by the Chinese companies Huawei, ZTE, and Hikvision.

The reason for the ban is concerns over potential security risks posed by these cameras. There are fears that the cameras could be used by the Chinese government to spy on the United States or steal sensitive information. In addition, there have been reports of security vulnerabilities in Hikvision cameras that could allow unauthorized access to the devices.

The ban only applies to federal agencies and contractors, but it is a significant move given the widespread use of these cameras in the United States. Many businesses and homeowners have installed Hikvision cameras, for example, for surveillance purposes.

It is worth noting that the ban has been controversial, with some arguing that it unfairly targets Chinese companies and that there is no concrete evidence of a security threat. Nonetheless, the ban remains in place and companies that do business with the federal government must comply with it.